Nuclear Reactors – ABWR http://abwr.org/ Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:48:19 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 https://abwr.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/default-150x150.png Nuclear Reactors – ABWR http://abwr.org/ 32 32 Fast nuclear reactors will be “radiation neutral” – president of the SAR – Science & Space https://abwr.org/fast-nuclear-reactors-will-be-radiation-neutral-president-of-the-sar-science-space/ https://abwr.org/fast-nuclear-reactors-will-be-radiation-neutral-president-of-the-sar-science-space/#respond Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:21:02 +0000 https://abwr.org/fast-nuclear-reactors-will-be-radiation-neutral-president-of-the-sar-science-space/ KAPSEL HARBOR / Crimea /, June 11. / TASS /. The use of next-generation fast neutron reactors in the nuclear power industry will allow Russia to minimize the amount of harmful waste, Russian Academy of Sciences President Alexander Sergeyev said on the sidelines of a forum on youth culture and the arts. Tavrida Friday. Earlier […]]]>


KAPSEL HARBOR / Crimea /, June 11. / TASS /. The use of next-generation fast neutron reactors in the nuclear power industry will allow Russia to minimize the amount of harmful waste, Russian Academy of Sciences President Alexander Sergeyev said on the sidelines of a forum on youth culture and the arts. Tavrida Friday.

Earlier this month, the city of Seversk in the Tomsk region saw the start of construction of a unique fast reactor, BREST-OD-300 (experimental and demonstrative). It is a Russian-designed fast neutron reactor using lead as a heat transfer agent, equipped with a dual-circuit steam supply system and having supercritical steam parameters.

“New reactors and closed-loop nuclear fuel use concepts will reduce the amount of radioactive waste to virtually nothing. Basically, the spent fuel will have a radiation level no higher than the natural background there, where the uranium was mined, “Sergeyev said.

He pointed out that scientists consider nuclear energy to be environmentally clean, but some phobias in society are still being felt. In reality, the nuclear industry does not produce greenhouse gases and its radiation level is much lower than the natural background noise. The high reliability of the new generation fast neutron reactors is a strong argument against the third fear on the risk of nuclear accident, and the prejudices against the dumping of nuclear waste.

“It is very good that in this respect [nuclear power industry development] Russia is the leader. According to current plans, this facility (the reactor that began to be built in Seversk – TASS) is to come into operation by 2030, “Sergeyev said.

Fast neutron reactor project

The unique BREST-300 reactor began to be built under a project guideline called Breakthrough to create a new technology platform for the nuclear power industry with a closed nuclear fuel cycle and to solve the problem of spent nuclear fuel. The project is implemented in the premises of the Siberian chemical compound of the company Rosatom. The project is expected to produce a competitive product capable of securing Russia’s leadership in the nuclear energy industry.

Rosatom CEO Alexei Likhachov said earlier that Rosatom hopes to start exporting fast reactors and fuel processing modules in 2030-2040. In addition, Rosatom organizations and three Russian universities will create a research consortium to design training programs to train specialists from European countries and China to operate next-generation reactors or fast neutron reactors.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/fast-nuclear-reactors-will-be-radiation-neutral-president-of-the-sar-science-space/feed/ 0
3rd guilty plea in failed nuclear project in South Carolina https://abwr.org/3rd-guilty-plea-in-failed-nuclear-project-in-south-carolina/ https://abwr.org/3rd-guilty-plea-in-failed-nuclear-project-in-south-carolina/#respond Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:06:00 +0000 https://abwr.org/3rd-guilty-plea-in-failed-nuclear-project-in-south-carolina/ FILE – In this file photo from September 21, 2016, parts of a containment building at the VC summer nuclear station are shown near Jenkinsville, South Carolina, during a media tour of the installation. A former manager of the contractor hired to build two nuclear reactors at VC’s summer power plant that were never completed, […]]]>


title=s

FILE – In this file photo from September 21, 2016, parts of a containment building at the VC summer nuclear station are shown near Jenkinsville, South Carolina, during a media tour of the installation. A former manager of the contractor hired to build two nuclear reactors at VC’s summer power plant that were never completed, pleaded guilty on Thursday June 10, 2021 to lying to federal authorities. (AP Photo / Chuck Burton, File)

PA

A former official for the contractor hired to build South Carolina’s two nuclear reactors that were never completed pleaded guilty Thursday to lying to federal authorities.

Carl Churchman argued in federal court, court records show.

Churchman was the project manager for Westinghouse Electric Co., the prime contractor for the construction of two new reactors at the VC Summer plant. The parent company of South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. SCANA Corp. and utility company Santee Cooper spent nearly $ 10 billion on the project before stopping construction in 2017 following Westinghouse’s bankruptcy.

The failure cost taxpayers and investors billions and left nearly 6,000 people unemployed.

Churchman pleaded guilty to making a false statement to federal officials, court records show. Allowed to remain on bail pending his conviction, he faces up to five years in prison and a fine of $ 250,000 and has agreed to help the authorities in their ongoing investigation.

Churchman lied to an FBI agent in 2019, saying he was not involved in communicating the project’s schedule with utility officials, authorities said. But, officials say, Churchman has repeatedly emailed colleagues at Westinghouse about project completion dates, which he reported to executives in 2017.

In another interview last month, Churchman admitted his initial statements were lies, prosecutors said.

“This guilty plea shows that the investigation into the VC Summer nuclear debacle did not end with the former executives of SCANA,” Acting US Attorney Rhett DeHart said in a statement. “We are committed to seeing this matter through and holding all guilty individuals and businesses accountable. “

The implosion led to multiple lawsuits, some by taxpayers claiming company executives knew the project was doomed and misled consumers and regulators as they demanded a series rate increases.

Dominion Energy ultimately paid more than $ 6.8 billion to buy back the shares of SCANA, also assuming its consolidated net debt of $ 6.6 billion. Lawmakers have mulled over the sale of Santee Cooper, but last week approved a redesign proposal that leaves the company public.

Two senior executives have already pleaded guilty in the multi-year federal failure fraud investigation, which cost taxpayers more than $ 2 billion and was probed by state lawmakers.

Former SCANA Corp. Executive Vice President Stephen Byrne agreed last summer to tell investigators everything he knew about the lies and deception used by SCANA and SCE & G to get regulators to approve increases in rates and maintain investor support.

Kevin Marsh, former CEO of SCANA, signed a plea deal on criminal fraud charges in November.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/3rd-guilty-plea-in-failed-nuclear-project-in-south-carolina/feed/ 0
Rosatom begins construction of a single power unit with the BREST-OD-300 fast neutron reactor https://abwr.org/rosatom-begins-construction-of-a-single-power-unit-with-the-brest-od-300-fast-neutron-reactor/ https://abwr.org/rosatom-begins-construction-of-a-single-power-unit-with-the-brest-od-300-fast-neutron-reactor/#respond Wed, 09 Jun 2021 21:20:51 +0000 https://abwr.org/rosatom-begins-construction-of-a-single-power-unit-with-the-brest-od-300-fast-neutron-reactor/ SEVERSK, Russia – Construction of a 300 MW nuclear power plant equipped with the innovative lead-cooled BREST-OD-300 fast reactor has started at the site of Siberian Chemical Combine (a subsidiary company of Rosatom TVEL Fuel Company) in Seversk, region Russian from Tomsk. (South-West Siberia). The reactor will operate with mixed uranium-plutonium nitride fuel (MNUP fuel), […]]]>


SEVERSK, Russia – Construction of a 300 MW nuclear power plant equipped with the innovative lead-cooled BREST-OD-300 fast reactor has started at the site of Siberian Chemical Combine (a subsidiary company of Rosatom TVEL Fuel Company) in Seversk, region Russian from Tomsk. (South-West Siberia). The reactor will operate with mixed uranium-plutonium nitride fuel (MNUP fuel), specially developed for this installation (it is considered the optimal solution for fast neutron reactors).

The plant will be an integral part of the Pilot Demonstration Energy Complex (PDEC) – a group of three unique interconnected facilities, including the nuclear fuel production plant (for fabrication and remanufacturing), the BREST-OD power unit -300, and the spent fuel reprocessing facility. For the first time in history, a nuclear power plant powered by a fast reactor will be built alongside closed fuel cycle maintenance companies on a single site.

After reprocessing, the spent fuel from the reactor will be sent for remanufacturing (ie reproduction in new fuel), thus giving this system the means to gradually become practically autonomous and independent of the contributions of external resources. The PDEC is being built as part of Rosatom’s “Breakthrough” project, aimed at developing the new technological platform for the nuclear industry.

“The nuclear power industry’s resource base will become virtually inexhaustible through the endless reprocessing of nuclear fuel. At the same time, future generations will be spared the problem of the accumulation of spent nuclear fuel.

“The successful implementation of this project will enable our country to become the world’s first owner of nuclear power technology that fully meets the principles of sustainable development in terms of the environment, accessibility, reliability and efficient use of resources. .

“Today, we reaffirm our reputation as a global leader in advancing nuclear technologies, which provides humanity with unique solutions aimed at improving people’s lives,” said Alexey Likhachev, CEO of Rosatom.

The design of the BREST-OD-300 lead-cooled reactor is based on the principles of so-called natural safety. The characteristics of the reactor made it possible to abandon the fusion trap, a large volume of support systems, and also to lower the safety class of non-reactor equipment.

The integral design and physics of the reactor installation make it possible to exclude accidents requiring the evacuation of the population. In the future, such installations should not only enhance the safety of nuclear energy, but also make it more economically competitive with respect to the most efficient thermal energy production (in particular, steam technology). gas).

“The implementation of the ‘Breakthrough’ project encompasses not only the development of innovative reactors, but also the introduction of next-generation nuclear fuel cycle technologies.

“First, this includes the production of dense nitride MNUP fuel, which will ensure the efficient operation of a lead-cooled fast reactor and will be composed entirely of recycled nuclear materials such as plutonium and depleted uranium.

“Second, it means more efficient and economically attractive radiochemical technologies for used fuel processing and waste management. Together, they will make the nuclear energy of the future in fact renewable with a virtually waste-free production line, ”said Natalia Nikipelova, President of Rosatom’s TVEL Fuel Company.

Rosatom Director General Alexey Likhachev, Tomsk Regional Governor Sergei Zhvachkin, Kurchatov Institute President Mikhail Kovalchuk, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi and other Russian and non-Russian guests attended the event . Russian Academy of Sciences President Alexander Sergeev and OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD NEA) Director General William Magwood sent video addresses.

According to the planned schedule, the BREST-OD-300 reactor is expected to enter service in 2026. A fuel production facility will be built by 2023 and construction of a spent fuel reprocessing module is expected to start by 2024. – SG



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/rosatom-begins-construction-of-a-single-power-unit-with-the-brest-od-300-fast-neutron-reactor/feed/ 0
Los Alamos laboratory could face increased demand for plutonium wells | Local News https://abwr.org/los-alamos-laboratory-could-face-increased-demand-for-plutonium-wells-local-news/ https://abwr.org/los-alamos-laboratory-could-face-increased-demand-for-plutonium-wells-local-news/#respond Wed, 09 Jun 2021 03:45:00 +0000 https://abwr.org/los-alamos-laboratory-could-face-increased-demand-for-plutonium-wells-local-news/ The plutonium-well plant at the Savannah River site in South Carolina will take years longer and cost billions of dollars more to scale up than expected, potentially pushing the Los Alamos National Laboratory to manufacture more nuclear bomb cores to fill the void, watch groups say. Over the past three years, plans were for the […]]]>


The plutonium-well plant at the Savannah River site in South Carolina will take years longer and cost billions of dollars more to scale up than expected, potentially pushing the Los Alamos National Laboratory to manufacture more nuclear bomb cores to fill the void, watch groups say.

Over the past three years, plans were for the Los Alamos lab to produce 30 plutonium warhead triggers by 2026 and for Savannah River to make 50 by 2030, but the latter turns out to be much more expensive and boring than expected.

Jill Hruby, the candidate for the National Nuclear Security Administration, told a U.S. Senate hearing last week that Savannah River may not be fully functional until 2035.

And a recently released budget proposal for the country’s nuclear weapons program through 2022 shows the estimated cost of converting the Savannah River site to an open-pit plant, rising from $ 4.6 billion to $ 11 billion. of dollars. A budget note indicated that the estimate could increase.

Hruby’s uneasy admission of the longer time required and skyrocketing costs indicate that converting this facility to a pit factory is a monstrous undertaking, and the lag is likely to affect the lab. of Los Alamos, said Tom Clements, executive director of the nonprofit SRS Watch.

“This is not only going to have an impact on the SRS projects, but it is going to put enormous pressure on the schedule, costs and environmental impacts of the Los Alamos surface plant,” Clements said. “It means that [the lab] will run five more years on its own.

Officials at the nuclear agency did not respond to questions about whether the Los Alamos laboratory could be used to dig more pits for the warheads.

The agency’s entire site analysis last year said Los Alamos is expected to have a “surge capacity” of 80 pits. This means that the lab would be able to increase pit production to this volume for short periods of time if needed.

At the time, agency officials said there were no plans to install the equipment needed to complete 80 pits on a regular basis.

However, agency spokeswoman Toni Chiri said The New Mexican in March 2020, such upgrades could take place in the future.

“Just because we have the capacity to do 80 wells does not mean that we will do 80,” Chiri said. “It’s impossible to predict what will happen in 10 years.

The most pits the lab dug in a year were for Navy missiles more than ten years ago.

Agency officials continue to express confidence that the lab will meet its 2026 target of making 30 pits per year, even though Savannah River requires more time.

Clements said sources at Capitol Hill said Savannah River’s estimated costs could reach $ 14 billion.

This site was originally intended to be a plant that turned old military grade plutonium into mixed oxide fuel for nuclear reactors. But skyrocketing cost overruns led the federal government to scuttle the project in 2019 after spending more than $ 7 billion.

“It could be a repeat of the MOX fuel debacle,” Clements said of the pit plant. “It’s totally run that way.”

In the end, more than five times could be spent on this building than what was spent on building the $ 4 billion One World Trade Center – all to make bomb cores, said Jay Coghlan, director. executive of the non-profit organization Nuclear Watch New Mexico.

Extending the renovations by several years is sure to put pressure on the lab to increase pit production beyond the current target, Coghlan said.

“I definitely predict it will have a boomerang effect on Los Alamos,” he said.

Clements said some of the new pits will arm a new generation of warheads. This is one of the main reasons why the two sites have launched a total of 80 pits per year by 2030, he said.

The Air Force has a new land-based intercontinental ballistic missile expected to enter service within the next decade, and leaders won’t want to delay deployment, he said, which could add pressure. on the lab.

But an anti-nuclear activist said it would cost Los Alamos at least as much to increase production from the pits, and that 30 pits would push the aging, even modernized, facility to full capacity.

“We’ve heard that 30 pits a year is the absolute maximum at LANL,” said Greg Mello, executive director of the nonprofit Los Alamos study group.

Savannah River can make a lot more pits than the lab, so it should be the only producer, Mello said.

Mello said his military-related sources said the Air Force would deploy its new warhead years later than the current plan. He won’t need the lab to intervene in the production of the pit because Savannah River is delayed, he said.

The Savannah River is also six miles from the nearest residential area, while the lab is only half a mile from a pueblo, Mello said.

Leona Morgan, a community activist with Diné No Nukes, said she was troubled to learn that the lab might end up producing more pits.

This would generate a larger flow of nuclear waste and require more uranium mining, all to make weapons the world doesn’t need, Morgan said. The government should use this money to clean up the waste left over from the Cold War that is affecting the environment and neighboring communities, she said.

The money could also be better spent on clean energy, education, infrastructure and feeding the poor, Morgan said.

“We cannot eat a nuclear weapon,” she said. “It won’t keep us warm at night.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/los-alamos-laboratory-could-face-increased-demand-for-plutonium-wells-local-news/feed/ 0
Holtec CDI announces layoffs at former nuclear power plant https://abwr.org/holtec-cdi-announces-layoffs-at-former-nuclear-power-plant/ https://abwr.org/holtec-cdi-announces-layoffs-at-former-nuclear-power-plant/#respond Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:01:52 +0000 https://abwr.org/holtec-cdi-announces-layoffs-at-former-nuclear-power-plant/ Controversial nuclear power plant near New York shuts down Indian Point will permanently stop producing nuclear power on Friday, disconnecting a key source of electricity for neighboring New York City which opponents say poses a threat to millions of people living in the surrounding, densely populated metropolitan area. . (April 29) PA Above: Holtec acquires […]]]>


to play

Above: Holtec acquires the Indian Point nuclear power plant in New York.

LACEY – A company dismantling the old Oyster Creek nuclear power plant has announced plans to lay off up to 92 employees later this summer, according to a company spokesperson and a WARN notice sent to the Department of Labor and of New Jersey Workforce Development.

Comprehensive Decommissioning International, or CDI, which is operated by nuclear products company Holtec International and engineering company SNC-Lavalin, is dismantling the old power plant.

The staff cuts were planned when the plant closed more than two years ago and have been communicated to employees, said Joseph Delmar, spokesperson for Holtec.

Work accident : Holtec employee splashed with radioactive water in Oyster Creek keg accident

“This job reduction has always been part of our safe and efficient decommissioning strategy for Oyster Creek as our project evolves from a nuclear-focused activity to a more industrial dismantling and demolition project,” he said. in an email to the press. “Now that all of the used nuclear fuel has been safely moved from inside the reactor building to the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI), our project will focus on the safe removal of buildings and structures. “

The layoffs will take effect on August 1, according to the Labor Ministry. Federal ADVISE Take action, or the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, requires prior notification of collective dismissals to certain factory workers, government employees, companies with more than 100 workers or their union representatives. Exemptions apply to businesses that close temporary facilities or stop layoffs due to a failed business, unforeseeable business circumstance, or natural disaster.

Oyster Creek managers and staff will be affected by the layoffs, Delmar said. Eligible employees will be offered severance packages, he added.

“A few dozen Holtec and CDI employees will remain and be supported by a skilled labor force from local unions near Oyster Creek, who will safely handle the remaining dismantling and demolition,” he said. he declares.

The demolition of Oyster Creek is expected to be completed by 2025, Delmar said. The plant’s ISFSI, where used nuclear fuel is stored in concrete and steel drums, will remain on site indefinitely until the federal government approves a new storage location.

Holtec is currently seeking federal approval to build an interim storage facility in New Mexico for used fuel from nuclear power plants across the country.

Energy markets: NJ accepts nuclear power grant that you will continue to pay for another three years

The company has also expressed interest to the federal government in using the Oyster Creek property to build a prototype small nuclear reactor at some point in the future. The prototype is still at the start of the development process.

The federal government gave out several grants to various nuclear companies, including Holtec, to design new small reactors that would be safer and nearly fusion-proof compared to older models.

Amanda Oglesby is originally from Ocean County and covers the townships of Brick, Barnegat and Lacey as well as the environment. She has worked for the press for over a decade. Contact her at @OglesbyAPP, aoglesby@gannettnj.com or 732-557-5701.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/holtec-cdi-announces-layoffs-at-former-nuclear-power-plant/feed/ 0
Eskom suspends Koeberg GM as delayed unit investigation ensues https://abwr.org/eskom-suspends-koeberg-gm-as-delayed-unit-investigation-ensues/ https://abwr.org/eskom-suspends-koeberg-gm-as-delayed-unit-investigation-ensues/#respond Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:01:45 +0000 https://abwr.org/eskom-suspends-koeberg-gm-as-delayed-unit-investigation-ensues/ The state-owned electricity company Eskom has confirmed that the general manager of its Koeberg nuclear power plant, Velaphi Ntuli, has been suspended while investigations are underway on the plant’s performance. Meanwhile, Eskom’s nuclear director Riedewaan Bakardian oversee plant operations. The utility has deemed it urgent to investigate the plant’s problems, given that one of its […]]]>


The state-owned electricity company Eskom has confirmed that the general manager of its Koeberg nuclear power plant, Velaphi Ntuli, has been suspended while investigations are underway on the plant’s performance.

Meanwhile, Eskom’s nuclear director Riedewaan Bakardian oversee plant operations.

The utility has deemed it urgent to investigate the plant’s problems, given that one of its largest generating units – with a capacity of 900 MW – has been down since January.

This unit could have contributed to reducing the depth of the load shedding that Eskom has put in place in recent weeks.

The unit was plagued with delays, causing a significant delay in the return to service date; however, the return to service of the unit is scheduled for the third week of June.

Eskom assures the public that there are no nuclear safety concerns at Koeberg and that, if necessary, the required time will be taken to complete outstanding work before returning the unit to the grid.

In a statement released by the Koeberg Alert Alliance (KAA), the anti-nuclear militant organization worries that Bakardien is not able to give full attention to all of its responsibilities and wonders what aspects of Eskom’s nuclear operations could be overlooked.

The organization says the investigation proves that there is a lack of nuclear expertise within Eskom and that there is too much dependence on too few people.

KAA says that, presumably, an underperforming factory manager has also neglected to effectively manage things in other areas such as maintenance, repairs and emergency preparedness.

Problems in these areas can only arise in the event of a malfunction of one of the nuclear reactors with potentially catastrophic consequences.

The organization adds that when it comes to the next person appointed to the job, the message is clear: keep the plant running or face a suspension. It is deeply problematic.

There are times when a minor equipment failure should result in a reactor shutdown even though the likelihood of it causing an accident is low, according to nuclear safety protocols.

But any new director will be in conflict between being very cautious for safety reasons and keeping the plant running for fear of a suspension, says KAA.

On another note, the National Union of Miners sees the suspension as a continuing attempt by the COO and CEO of the Eskom Group to purge black Eskom executives, citing poor performance issues.

The union adds that it cannot ignore what it considers to be a reversal of the gains of the transformation.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/eskom-suspends-koeberg-gm-as-delayed-unit-investigation-ensues/feed/ 0
UFO sightings at top secret US nuclear weapons sites raise fears of Pentagon report | World | New https://abwr.org/ufo-sightings-at-top-secret-us-nuclear-weapons-sites-raise-fears-of-pentagon-report-world-new/ https://abwr.org/ufo-sightings-at-top-secret-us-nuclear-weapons-sites-raise-fears-of-pentagon-report-world-new/#respond Sun, 06 Jun 2021 10:14:00 +0000 https://abwr.org/ufo-sightings-at-top-secret-us-nuclear-weapons-sites-raise-fears-of-pentagon-report-world-new/ A former senior Pentagon official has revealed that the United States has been tracking UFOs since 1950 amid a mysterious link to nuclear technology. Lue Elizondo told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson that dozens of UFOs appear to have performed “some sort of reconnaissance or surveillance of our technology and nuclear weapons.” He also dismissed claims […]]]>


A former senior Pentagon official has revealed that the United States has been tracking UFOs since 1950 amid a mysterious link to nuclear technology. Lue Elizondo told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson that dozens of UFOs appear to have performed “some sort of reconnaissance or surveillance of our technology and nuclear weapons.” He also dismissed claims that UFOs are linked to experimental technology from a rival power, such as China or Russia.

It comes as a US government report on sightings of unidentified flying objects found no evidence of alien activity but does not rule it out.

U.S. media have been told that a review of 120 incidents concluded that U.S. technology was not involved in most cases.

Speculation over the report’s content increased among UFO enthusiasts ahead of its full release in Congress on June 25.

Mr. Elizondo noted that the recently declassified documents include eyewitness reports of US special agents and scientists “having seen UFOs over sensitive US military installations.”

JUST IN: Joe Biden Goofs As POTUS Claims Jan 2021 Was 15 Months Ago

Mr Carlson said: “There seems to be an anecdotal connection between these objects and nuclear reactors, nuclear warheads, nuclear submarines and warships.

“We didn’t get nuclear technology until the end of World War II.”

Mr. Elizondo explained, “There appears to be a significant increase in sightings once the United States enters the atomic age.

“It seemed like a recognition or a watch on our nuclear technology, our nuclear development – whether it was its power or its weapon system and related technology.”

Mr Carlson noted: “It doesn’t make sense. There were famines in China 70 years ago.”

The Pentagon UFO report is the product of a military task force established last year to investigate decades of unexplained aerial sightings in U.S. airspace.

In an interview with CBS last month, retired pilot Ryan Graves said his squadron of fighter jets began to see UFOs hovering over the restricted airspace off the coast of Virginia. in 2014.

He said the objects had no visible exhaust plumes and were moving at speeds that appeared to defy the limits of known technology.

Mr Graves said pilots training off the Atlantic coast had similar sightings “every day for at least a few years”.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/ufo-sightings-at-top-secret-us-nuclear-weapons-sites-raise-fears-of-pentagon-report-world-new/feed/ 0
Buffett and Gates build nuclear power plant in coal country https://abwr.org/buffett-and-gates-build-nuclear-power-plant-in-coal-country/ https://abwr.org/buffett-and-gates-build-nuclear-power-plant-in-coal-country/#respond Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:00:00 +0000 https://abwr.org/buffett-and-gates-build-nuclear-power-plant-in-coal-country/ Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have chosen one of America’s major coal-producing states as the location for a new type of nuclear reactor, using Natrium as the power source. Natrium’s power plant, with a projected cost of $ 1 billion, will reuse a coal-fired power plant for its operations in Wyoming, with the exact location […]]]>


Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have chosen one of America’s major coal-producing states as the location for a new type of nuclear reactor, using Natrium as the power source.

Natrium’s power plant, with a projected cost of $ 1 billion, will reuse a coal-fired power plant for its operations in Wyoming, with the exact location to be announced by the end of 2021. The partners hope this will help. the United States on the road to a zero carbon future.

The development consists of a 345 megawatt sodium-cooled fast reactor with molten salt energy storage that could increase the system output power to 500 MW during peak demand. This would provide enough energy to power up to 400,000 homes.

The project will be overseen by TerraPower and Pacificorp, founded by Gates and Buffett respectively. TerraPower has played a key role in explore the potential of Natrium last year, the US Department of Energy granted the company $ 80 million in funding to demonstrate the potential potency of the chemical.

“We believe Natrium will be a game-changer for the energy industry”, Gates declared of the project.

TerraPower President and CEO Chris Levesque adds, “We need this kind of clean energy on the grid in the 2030s.

Some experts criticize the plans, warning that advanced reactors may present a higher risk than their conventional counterparts. Reactor fuel must be enriched at a higher rate than conventional fuel, making the supply chain a potential target for groups trying to build a brute nuclear weapon.

However, advanced nuclear reactors have simpler designs than conventional reactors, making them easier to build, more fuel efficient, cheaper and safer.

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon believe “This is our fastest and clearest path to going carbon negative,” declaring: “Nuclear power is clearly part of my overall energy strategy.”

The project is expected to provide carbon-free energy on demand, as well as hundreds of short and long-term jobs in the construction and operation of factories. This will give a much needed boost to Wyoming’s employment sector after two decades of coal-fired plant closures.

While two out of three nuclear reactors in the world are expected to be decommissioned in the near future, the United States continues to invest heavily in nuclear power. For example, the Vogtle nuclear power plant in Georgia is expected to enter commercial operation in November 2021, at a cost of $ 28 billion. It seems that despite the abandonment of nuclear power in recent years, we cannot ignore its potential as a world leader in energy.

After a decade of decline after major disasters such as Fukushima in 2011, which wiped out Japan’s nuclear program, two countries, Belarus and the United Arab Emirates, recently commissioned new nuclear power plants. In addition, Japan aims to reintroduce nuclear capabilities, with at least 5 safety-enhanced reactors expected to be put back into service by 2025.

The Middle East and South Asia are expected to increase nuclear power generation by the end of the decade, with Turkey, Egypt, Bangladesh, China and India all investing in nuclear reactors. This has driven uranium stocks up since late 2020, with two major uranium miners listed in the United States, Uranium Energy Corp. and Cameco Corporation, both experiencing a steady climb.

Despite the recent decline in nuclear power, plans to invest in putting existing reactors back into service and developing new ones suggest that nuclear power is not yet dead. Moreover, if Gates and Buffett succeed in developing their advanced Natrium reactor, it could pave the way for future projects.

By Felicity Bradstock for Oil Octobers

More most popular reads on Oil Octobers:



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/buffett-and-gates-build-nuclear-power-plant-in-coal-country/feed/ 0
Nuclear hydrogen production will require 400 reactors worldwide: report https://abwr.org/nuclear-hydrogen-production-will-require-400-reactors-worldwide-report/ https://abwr.org/nuclear-hydrogen-production-will-require-400-reactors-worldwide-report/#respond Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:00:52 +0000 https://abwr.org/nuclear-hydrogen-production-will-require-400-reactors-worldwide-report/ A new French report has calculated the number of reactors needed to meet global demand for H2. In order to use the production of hydrogen nuclear fuel to meet the global demand for emission-free fuel, 400 1 GW reactors would be needed. This, according to a report that the French parliamentary office recently published to […]]]>


A new French report has calculated the number of reactors needed to meet global demand for H2.

In order to use the production of hydrogen nuclear fuel to meet the global demand for emission-free fuel, 400 1 GW reactors would be needed. This, according to a report that the French parliamentary office recently published to assess scientific and technological choices.

Currently, 99% of hydrogen production is powered by carbon-emitting fossil fuels.

The world is therefore looking for cleaner, low-carbon H2 production alternatives using electrolysis powered by renewable energy sources or nuclear hydrogen reactors. The French Parliament’s OPECST declared: “The path to low-carbon hydrogen from nuclear electricity would represent 400 new 1 GW nuclear reactors. [on a global scale], ”In his report.

This report adds that taking such a path would be “chimerical”, because it is a period when many countries, including France, “are reducing the share of nuclear power in their energy mix”.

OPECST data showed that to use electrolysis to produce H2, France would have to use “the equivalent of four dedicated nuclear power plants only for the production of electricity.

Nuclear hydrogen production was under consideration because France is behind on EU targets.

“Hydrogen production represents 2% of French anthropogenic CO2 production,” said OPECST vice-president Gérard Longuet, who considered that conventional H2 production was “unbearable”.

France has already largely missed its 2020 renewable energy targets. This situation will only worsen if considerable measures are not taken, as the European Union should very soon raise its renewable energy targets for 2030. Without modifying its strategy, France will be faced with problems. notables in trying to achieve the new goals.

Longuet and mathematician Cédric Villani, French deputy for Ecology Democracy Solidarity, declared that without the use of nuclear hydrogen production, France would not be able to produce the H2 it needs while reducing its emissions of greenhouse gas. Having said that, they have both Nuclear Hydrogen Fuel - Renewable Hydrogen News - Pick It Up Here and Save the Oceanexpressed that France will have to supplement the use of nuclear energy by that of other sources of electricity production, with particular reference to renewable energy sources.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/nuclear-hydrogen-production-will-require-400-reactors-worldwide-report/feed/ 0
why didn’t this film ask the real questions? https://abwr.org/why-didnt-this-film-ask-the-real-questions/ https://abwr.org/why-didnt-this-film-ask-the-real-questions/#respond Wed, 02 Jun 2021 21:00:00 +0000 https://abwr.org/why-didnt-this-film-ask-the-real-questions/ Pumping coolant. Rod insertion mechanisms. Fast neutrons. Thanks to Craig Mazin’s magnificent Chernobyl, we are now all experts in nuclear reactors. Construction of Britain’s largest nuclear power plant (BBC Two) has sometimes referred to the “dark legacy” of the disaster, among other controversies surrounding the ongoing construction of Hinkley Point C in Somerset, but it […]]]>


Pumping coolant. Rod insertion mechanisms. Fast neutrons. Thanks to Craig Mazin’s magnificent Chernobyl, we are now all experts in nuclear reactors. Construction of Britain’s largest nuclear power plant (BBC Two) has sometimes referred to the “dark legacy” of the disaster, among other controversies surrounding the ongoing construction of Hinkley Point C in Somerset, but it was a largely joyous affair focused on the technical aspects, flabbergasted by the logistical challenges, impressed by the engineering feats and above all upset by the statistics.

The project includes two uranium reactors on a site the size of 250 football fields, generating 3.2 gigawatts of electricity for the next 60 years from 2025. Not enough numbers? How about 5.6 million cubic meters of excavated earth for the foundations of the reactor, filled in three days of continuous pouring with “nuclear grade” concrete? Or 120,000 liters of seawater pumped every second to cool the steam from the reactors? Or 316 tonnes of baked beans consumed per year by 5,000 workers on site? By the time they got to the giant boring machine, I was numb. Although there is something to be said for a movie that gives fried breakfasts an epic dimension.

With a zero carbon goal by 2050 and lingering skepticism about renewables, much hinges on the success of the project, the first of its kind in Europe. So it seemed a little odd that a local’s (admittedly very valid) complaints about trafficking were granted more airtime than, say, concerns about industrial espionage in a project funded in part by the Chinese state, or inflated budgets (from 18 billion to 22 billion pounds). Two of its three predicted predecessors in Finland and France remain on the ice due to “concerns about cost and quality”, a phrase both vague and serious enough to warrant further investigation, but doubts have been confined to the voiceover and not to the people involved. .

All those questioned underlined the progress of safety measures in the nuclear industry since the 1980s, accompanied by many undeniably reassuring examples of absolute professionalism. Unlike Chernobyl, the reactors will be housed inside a reinforced concrete fortress designed to withstand earthquakes, tsunamis and plane crashes. “I think the next time these foundations come up, it will probably be after the next ice age,” said construction chief and fortune hostage Mike Murphy. After all, director Mat Stimpson documented the construction of Crossrail in the BBC’s The Fifteen Billion Pound Railway: the presence of cameras is no guarantee of success.



Source link

]]>
https://abwr.org/why-didnt-this-film-ask-the-real-questions/feed/ 0