Letters from the Readers: Let’s take a look at what nuclear power can do for us


Scottish Green Party Co-Chair Lorna Slater (Photo: Michael Gillen)

However, by suggesting that to refuse a debate on constitutional issues “is to accept that we trust Boris Johnson on important issues like energy policy …” I do not trust Westminster on energy policy and I do not trust the Scottish government or the Greens Party because to date they have not presented any credible energy policy.

There has been no debate on Scotland’s future energy sector, assuming it can be defined separately from the GB, to show what the outcome of the shutdown of our two nuclear power plants will be.

Register now to our opinion newsletter

Register now to our opinion newsletter

The importance of not discussing this issue was underlined for two weeks, from April 11 to 25, when generation capacity in Scotland was only supplying around 16% of demand from nuclear power plants (mainly Torness) and power plants. gas (Peterhead), the rest coming from factories in England and Wales and European interconnections, mainly from nuclear power plants in France.

I agree with Lorna Slater when she says: “We have to be realistic about the climate [change] and do it quickly. “I am convinced that it is inconceivable that we could decarbonize our electricity grid at a lower cost without significantly increasing our nuclear capacity. Nuclear power can provide countries around the world with solutions to prevent global warming, but it should be a an issue that is urgently being dealt with and debated by politicians.

Any mention of nuclear power was notable for its absence in all political literature in the weeks leading up to the Scottish elections.

C Scott, Mortonhall Road, Edinburgh

I must get old. You see, in my day, an election pamphlet told you about a party’s policies in terms of health, education, housing, transportation, employment, etc.

I now have a glossy Tory flyer telling me to vote Tory because only they can stop the SNP and block another independence referendum. My Labor leaflet tells me that by voting for the Labor Party we can defeat the SNP and prevent a referendum. Yet they shrink from the idea of ​​working together. I bet this confuses new voters.

John V Lloyd, Keith Place, Inverkeithing, Fife

The Scottish ferry Calmac contract debacle is a current glaring example of how the SNP is unable to run an effective and transparent government and the program is riddled with so many cases of blatant incompetence and maladministration that it is unbelievable .

Both ferries were ordered by the Scottish Government in 2014 at a three-year fixed contract price of £ 97million (which was the highest bid of the six submitted!) And they were to be the pride of Nicola’s government Sturgeon, with a capacity to carry more than 1,000 passengers (three to five times more capacity than necessary).

In November 2017, the partially built MV Glen Sannox launched with a bang (including painted windows to make it more complete than it was) amid promises of its soon-to-be sister ship.

Now in 2021, the MV Glen Sannox is still half-finished, has rust and water damage, and the sister ship (still known as the Hull 808) hasn’t even come out of the dry dock. .

The three-year £ 97million project is estimated to be completed in 2023 at a cost of over £ 250million – with any luck. In the meantime, Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd (CMAL) and SNP continue to stumble from disaster to disaster with aging ferries breaking down on various routes while government-owned contractor Ferguson Marine pays more from £ 790,000 to a ‘turnaround manager’. a year to ‘solve’ the ferry construction fiasco and is currently experiencing losses of around £ 25million per month.

All in all, this botched scheme will cost the taxpayer over £ 200million – and where will it end?

Ian Paynter, Inglewood Crescent, East Kilbride

Read more

Read more

Scottish election 2021: a Green New Deal would help create well-paying jobs and a …

The Prime Minister of Scotland admitted on television that an independent Scotland would mean a hard border with the rest of the UK for the first time in over 300 years.

Imagine how it works with 60 percent of our exports going to the rest of the UK, compared to just 19 percent to the EU. In Scotland, we need to be aware of the economic and social disaster that a hard border with our main trading partner would cause.

As an employer of over 60 people in central Scotland, but with 82 percent of our goods going to England, what reasonable argument can be made to keep us here?

We continue to be informed about the economic outlook and the benefits of reintegration into the EU. Don’t be fooled; we would hardly have any say in our future with the EU because we would hardly have a place at the table.

If Scotland were able to re-enter the EU, we would have six out of 705 MEPs in the European Parliament. Compare that to 59 out of 650 MPs in Westminster. On top of that, those trying to orchestrate our independence from the UK are unlikely to be around to deal with the consequences of the worst divorce our country has ever seen.

We in Scotland need to realize the reality of the disaster that an independent Scotland would be and make decisions with our heads, not our hearts.

Greg Paterson, The Beeches, Kirkcaldy

While the new brand “abrdn” chosen by Standard Life Aberdeen is both absurd and unpronounceable, sometimes new names can be justified.

Many years ago, as part of my business, I had to phone an accounting firm in Edinburgh.

There had been an amalgamation of not one, but three important practices and I was about to find out how they had yet to decide on a name.

To my initial “hello”, a young receptionist replied: “Ernst and Ernst, Whinney Murray, Turquands, Baron and Mayhew, hello”.

No wonder that within hours, it seems, a new name was forged in the heat (arguably) of the same mockery that Standard Life Aberdeen is currently experiencing. That name was Ernst & Whinney, which has now become EY, a masterstroke in brevity.

Maybe abrdn will decide to change its name. What about SLA, Standard Aberdeen or Staberdeen? Forget the last one.

Andrew HN Gray, Craiglea Drive, Edinburgh

The announcement that the UK and Norway have failed to secure a fisheries deal and the fishing industry warning that hundreds of crew will be left out of work as UK fleets will not have access to Norway’s subarctic waters for their cod catch is just the latest Brexit disaster hits the Scottish agri-food industry

The latest data from the Bureau of National Statistics shows how badly food and drink exports have been hit, with February milk and dairy sales falling more than 96 percent year-on-year. other, chicken exports falling 79.5 percent and beef almost down. 78 percent.

Overall, there has been a slippage of almost 41 percent – with imports from Europe down 17 percent and from July 1 all EU imports will be subject to the VAT. The Scottish shellfish industry has been devastated as Europeans do not buy Scottish products due to longer delivery times.

EFTA members Switzerland and Norway have much better veterinary and trade deals with the EU than those negotiated by Boris Johnson and the UK government.

In addition, the end of free movement will hurt Edinburgh’s tourist, hotel and university sectors which normally depend on EU workers and researchers.

Despite all this, Labor and Liberal Democrats have given up on returning to the EU and they are unlikely to change their stance anytime soon, as that would upend their grassroots support in England.

Mary Thomas, Watson Crescent, Edinburgh

I read with wonder and admiration the extraordinary letter from Leah Gunn Barrett (“Independent Scotland could bin big banks”, Scotsman, May 1). His plan is indeed incredible and revolutionary.

“An independent Scotland has the opportunity to build a financial system that prioritizes public wealth creation over private greed,” she writes. I see only a minor problem in its worthy goals.

The most recent figures from Statista show: “ In 2019, Scotland’s exports amounted to £ 86.48 billion, while imports were £ 93.45 billion, which is translated into a net trade balance of £ 6.97 billion. ” So without oil to help, Scotland now has a large deficit to finance.

GERS also paints a problematic picture. For 2019/20, ‘Scotland spent £ 15.1 billion more on public services than it raised in taxes last year’ – BBC.

Since then, the support of Covid19 has considerably widened this deficit

I know independence supporters don’t like the Scottish government-produced GERS, but we are still waiting for an authorized alternative.

So a newly formed Scottish central bank will have to go to banks its government wants to dissolve and ask for perhaps £ 20bn to fill the first year budget deficit and an additional £ 7bn to help finance imports. surplus pending its “creation of public wealth”. »To generate a substantial surplus on the budget and the trade balance.

I suggest it would be an uphill battle with no end in sight.

John Peter, Monks Road, Airdrie

While the sport has taken a stand this weekend, I understand that bullying on social media is hard to control because people are anonymous.

But bullying is rife in our schools and bullies are known there.

Maybe if society dealt with bullies sooner and they took the brunt of their actions, they wouldn’t feel as empowered to continue bullying through social media.

Elizabeth Hands, Etna Court, Armadale

We appreciate your thoughts. Write to [email protected] including name, address and telephone number. Keep letters under 300 words, without attachments, and avoid letters to the editor in your subject line.

A message from the editor

Thank you for reading this article. We depend on your support more than ever, because the change in consumption habits induced by the coronavirus is having an impact on our advertisers.

If you haven’t already, consider supporting our trusted and verified journalism by purchasing a digital subscription.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.