Nuclear power, as well as nuclear weapons, must be opposed


HANT (Highlands Against Nuclear Transport) is an activist group opposing both nuclear weapons and nuclear energy, which aligns with current SNP / Scottish Greens government policy.

There is much to welcome in George Monbiot’s article, in which he asserts his belief that the Scottish government could show the world a way out of the climate crisis and in particular the idea of ​​pursuing “public luxury” with more public facilities, transport, health. public services and public land ownership as opposed to increasing private wealth and inequality.

READ MORE: Scottish CND fusion reactor slams as attempt to ‘keep industry alive’

However, he fails to mention his support for nuclear power, which he described in a 2011 Guardian article titled “Why Fukushima Made Me Stop Worrying and Loving Nuclear Power” in which he argued that nuclear was safer than coal and should be supported. as well as renewable energies, about which he also has doubts.

He claimed that the effect of Fukushima was small for people and the planet – clearly false, as 150,000 people had to be evacuated from the area and the radiation spread over a wide area. 18,000 people were killed by the tsunami that caused the disaster – the cleanup by thousands of workers will continue for 30 years.

Regarding nuclear fusion, HANT has declared its opposition to a proposed pilot project for Dounreay at Caithness and it was recently announced that the bid for the project has not been successful.

READ MORE: Campaign criticizes investments by Natwest nuclear weapons companies

HANT supports the Scottish CND’s opposition to the proposed nuclear fusion project for Ardeer in Ayrshire and urges the Scottish government to oppose the plan.

Attempts to exploit nuclear fusion have been made in several countries over the past 70 years costing millions of pounds without success, and as Scottish CND points out, there are concerns about safety, waste generation and the link potential with the production of nuclear weapons.

Support for new nuclear projects and support for nuclear fusion projects, as well as proposals for small modular reactors, are all desperate attempts by the nuclear industry to revive nuclear power at a time when it is in decline around the world.

HANT would urge the Scottish government to maintain its policy of opposing nuclear weapons and nuclear energy of all kinds.

Tor Justad
President, HANT (Highlands Against Nuclear Weapons)

I couldn’t believe my eyes reading Nan Spowart’s article on the Scottish Government’s reaction to Ardeer’s inclusion on a UK government shortlist for a nuclear fusion site. All my years of supporting the party have mainly been based on non-nuclear use. That we have the nuclear weapons of the United States and the British government in our own backyard is in itself an abomination, so contemplating new proposals for nuclear fusion in Scotland is unimaginable.

Much has tested the resilience of SNP supporters in recent years, including the party’s delays and procrastination in taking concrete steps towards independence. However, I am sorry to say that if the Scottish Government allowed this to happen, it could just be the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Dr. Moran
Thornhill, Dumfries and Galloway

Opponents of the nuclear fusion site see it in black and white and do not understand the technology. They are simply reacting to the tag “nuclear” which means that anything associated with it is bad and should be banned. They are forgetting the medical uses of nuclear, for example, and providing no answer to the conundrum of ensuring that there is enough energy available when renewables cannot meet demand.

READ MORE: Scottish independence can free us from the Trident nuclear nightmare

They aren’t able to articulate or recognize the consequences when this happens, and the reason is because the answer conflicts with their deeply held beliefs. They also forget that we are entirely dependent and a direct product of the sun, which is a huge unlimited fusion reactor, held together by its gravity. A direct result of this is that we are all continually exposed to a background level of electromagnetic and nuclear radiation that we cannot do anything about.

Nuclear disarmament has nothing to do with fusion-based power generation, and while fission reactors have emerged to provide nuclear weapon material, fusion cannot be used in the same. goal. Naively opposing anything that has the slightest connection to their core beliefs does not help them get their arguments across, let alone reassure the public about future energy supplies. The creation of fusion reactors allows two things: on the one hand, a very clean base load and makes it an inexhaustible source of energy, and on the other hand the means to dispose of the fusion reactors and therefore the source of nuclear weapon material. Fusion offers a way to achieve nuclear disarmament. All we have to do is persuade states like Korea and Iran to do the same!

Nick cole
Meigle, Perthshire

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.